I. OVERVIEW
The death of Prime Minister Meles Zenawi, who had not been seen in public for several months, was announced on 20 August 2012 by Ethiopian state television. The passing of the man who has been Ethiopia’s epicentre for 21 years will have profound national and regional consequences. Meles engineered one-party rule in effect for the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) and his Tigrayan inner circle, with the complicity of other ethnic elites that were co-opted into the ruling alliance, the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF). The Front promised freedom, democracy and ethnic devolution but is highly centralised, tightly controls the economy and suppresses political, social, ethnic and religious liberties. In recent years, Meles had relied ever more on repression to quell growing dissent. His successor will lead a weaker regime that struggles to manage increasing unrest unless it truly implements ethnic federalism and institutes fundamental governance reform. The international community should seek to influence the transition actively because it has a major interest in the country’s stability.
Despite his authoritarianism and poor human rights records, Meles became an important asset to the international community, a staunch Western ally in counter-terrorism efforts in the region and a valued development partner for Western and emerging powers. In consequence, Ethiopia has become the biggest aid recipient in Africa, though Meles’s government was only able to partially stabilise either the country or region. Ethiopia’s political system and society have grown increasingly unstable largely because the TPLF has become increasingly repressive, while failing to implement the policy of ethnic federalism it devised over twenty years ago to accommodate the land’s varied ethnic identities. The result has been greater political centralisation, with concomitant ethnicisation of grievances. The closure of political space has removed any legitimate means for people to channel those grievances. The government has encroached on social expression and curbed journalists, non-governmental organisations and religious freedoms. The cumulative effect is growing popular discontent, as well as radicalisation along religious and ethnic lines. Meles adroitly navigated a number of internal crises and kept TPLF factions under his tight control. Without him, however, the weaknesses of the regime he built will be more starkly exposed.
The transition will likely be an all-TPLF affair, even if masked beneath the constitution, the umbrella of the EPRDF and the prompt elevation of the deputy Prime Minister, Hailemariam Desalegn, to acting head of government. Given the opacity of the inner workings of the government and army, it is impossible to say exactly what it will look like and who will end up in charge. Nonetheless, any likely outcome suggests a much weaker government, a more influential security apparatus and endangered internal stability. The political opposition, largely forced into exile by Meles, will remain too fragmented and feeble to play a considerable role, unless brought on board in an internationally-brokered process. The weakened Tigrayan elite, confronted with the nation’s ethnic and religious cleavages, will be forced to rely on greater repression if it is to maintain power and control over other ethnic elites. Ethno-religious divisions and social unrest are likely to present genuine threats to the state’s long-term stability and cohesion.
The regional implications will be enormous. Increasing internal instability could threaten the viability of Ethiopia’s military interventions in Somalia and Sudan, exacerbate tensions with Eritrea, and, more broadly, put in question its role as the West’s key regional counter-terrorism ally. Should religious or ethnic radicalisation grow, it could well spill across borders and link with other armed radical Islamic groups.
The international community, particularly Ethiopia’s core allies, the U.S., UK and European Union (EU), should accordingly seek to play a significant role in preparing for and shaping the transition, by:
Tying political, military and development assistance to the opening of political space and an end to repressive measures;
Encouraging the post-Meles leadership to produce a clear roadmap, including transparent mechanisms within the TPLF and the EPRDF for apportioning the party and Front power Meles held and within parliament to lead to an all-inclusive, peaceful transition, resulting in free and fair elections within a fixed time; and
Helping to revive the political opposition’s ability to represent its constituencies, in both Ethiopia and the Diaspora.
Tags: Addis Ababa, Meles Zenawi
Mr. Abebe Gelaw, Journalist and Human Rights Activist by Robele AbabyaThis day marks the 1st An[...]
At AU summit, Kerry should speak out for a free press May 16, 2013Honorable John Kerry U.S. De[...]
by Robele Ababya, 17 May 2013USA locking horns with the monster it created?The TPLF regime w[...]
Like it or not Ethiopians are coming together to end Woyane rule. What is left for regime and its st[...]
© 2012, ↑ ECADF Ethiopian News
Log in- Posts - Add New - Powered by WordPress - Designed by Gabfire & Modified by ECADF
Askale Dama
August 23, 2012 at 2:18 pm
Tenesa,
I partly share your anger. But, how should we read the ICG assessment? The document is prepared for a particular audience and even though it is factual as we speak, it doesn’t mean that its predictions will surely take place. All of the stories, reports, and thoughts contained in that document are about persons and their possible actions. As you well know people’s thoughts, actions, and outcomes are dynamic and volatile. Everything will change.
I saw the document as a general outline of things and expressions of people’s own suggestive thoughts. When a given event happens tomorrow, it is going to be somewhat different or totally different.
The same is true of the opposition. It is not the lack of opposition that is the problem but the nature of the underlying socio-economic and political contraditions and the types of opposition movements they are generating. The problem is about a unied national purpose, a coherent national mission around which most of the opposition works as one. And, this is about leadership but it is also about the size of our diversity as a people.
All of the Ethiopian ethnic groups and parties sleep in the same bed called Ethiopia, but they all see different dreams. I agree with you that our political philosphy and theory have been impoverished. After 50 years of more or less continuous political activism, we still lack a majority intellectual class that truly believes in the right of man and in the inviolability of the human individual as a foundation of our political order.
Ethnicity is a muddle, it is shere confusion that tries to translate primitive human distinctions into a modern principle of political organization of society. It is this muddle we have to clean up before we are able to grow a real movement for free society of free individuals. I think this has to do with human development.
But the west is financing forces that are working against critical human development, the growth free individuals and democratic thinkers. Ethiopia is burried in the mud of ethnicity. That I think is the problem of the opposition.
Tenesa
August 23, 2012 at 8:23 am
This ICG report is a must-read analysis by all of us. The report is fair, direct, and balanced. It is based on good research and a lot of facts. And it is not politically motivated either. The
report should also be used by the Western donors to serve them as their manual when dealing with TPLF in the future.
But the truth stated in this report about the Ethiopian opposition is heartbreaking. But it is painfully true. It makes you feel that the opposition has no respect from anyone and it is looked down upon. This is totally unacceptable given the intellectual power and majority of our people behind the opposition.
The West are using this fake economic progress in Ethiopia as an excuse to support this killer regime where the TPLF establishment and its allies are ripping the benefit of at least one billion dollars a year aid from the US and more from others. They should have done what they are doing in their own countries. Measure economic progress by the level of jobs created and who is benefiting instead of a mere capital flow and investments made.
Do not vote for Obama this November. Did you hear what he said about dictator Zenawi’s passing? Obama praised Zenawi for fighting for the Ethiopian poor. Not long ago, Obama said Africa does not need strong men but strong institutions. And now he is flip floping. Obama does not know what he is talking about.
Vote against Obama in November.
Desta
August 23, 2012 at 2:13 am
Ato Bereket semon had to go cesarean section .He was unable to wait until September.